Bone Stock 06 Mustang GT Kills - Page 3 - Mod Motor Tech Forums
Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi

Mod Motor Tech Forums  


Street Racing & Kill Stories Who did you beat? Post it here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-03-2007, 04:14 PM   #21  
Teching In
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bww3588
get used to it. untill ford can come up with somthing that can take it without slapping a huffer on it, its not going to shut us up. as of now the only thing that can take an LS1 f-body is the 03/04 cobra's, the 07 GT500 and the new GT. and thoes are all 40K-150K cars.
LOL, right....

I was beating LS1s when my Mach was completely bone stock. And I paid $20K for mine with 2000 miles on it, and that was a little over two years ago... I believe low mile F-bodies are still around $20K or more right now.

My best time so far (since our track has been closed for a year and a half) is [email protected] with a 2.09 short time and 5800ft. DA that night.... I've got a few more good bolt-ons now than I did back then, and I can only imagine what I would do at sea level with some slicks....

Here's a nice video of a Zinc Yellow 2003 Mach with only a Prochamber midpipe, K&N filter, and 275 Nitto DRs running [email protected]
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ach+1%22&hl=en

Keep talking bout your glorious LS1 though....
djlethalwang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 04:39 PM   #22  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 7,207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djlethalwang
LOL, right....

I was beating LS1s when my Mach was completely bone stock. And I paid $20K for mine with 2000 miles on it, and that was a little over two years ago... I believe low mile F-bodies are still around $20K or more right now.

My best time so far (since our track has been closed for a year and a half) is [email protected] with a 2.09 short time and 5800ft. DA that night.... I've got a few more good bolt-ons now than I did back then, and I can only imagine what I would do at sea level with some slicks....

Here's a nice video of a Zinc Yellow 2003 Mach with only a Prochamber midpipe, K&N filter, and 275 Nitto DRs running [email protected]
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ach+1%22&hl=en

Keep talking bout your glorious LS1 though....
yeah im calling :BS: the only way you beat an LS1 bone stock is if the driver of the LS1 sucked big time. theres no way in hell a Mach is faster than an LS1. never have been, never will be. hell, i raced a 01 Cobra the other night, and walked all over it. 5 times. from a dig and a roll......untill i see proof of these mods on this Mach, im calling :BS:
bww3588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 04:40 PM   #23  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 7,207
Default

oh yeah, BTW, i bought my LS1 f-body for $9655.50 out the door. and it only had 45k on it when i bought it.
bww3588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 04:16 PM   #24  
Teching In
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bww3588
oh yeah, BTW, i bought my LS1 f-body for $9655.50 out the door. and it only had 45k on it when i bought it.
Yeah, and your car is also a '98 model...

You can call BS all you want but anybody with any kind of knowledge of cars will know that a Mach 1 is very well capable of beating an LS1 stock for stock. F-bodies do usually put down more power to the wheels from the factory, but Machs are a few hundred pounds lighter, and have better suspension for launching off the line. The best time i've ever heard of out of a completely stock Mach down to the tires is a 12.8. MM&FF got one down to 13.1 in one of their tests. Give credit where credit is due...

I'm not saying i've never been beat by an LS1, because I have... but I have won more than I've lost. Several of my friends own F-bodies, so I respect those cars, but I can't stand it when someone thinks they are unbeatable. Even my buddies know that I can usually beat an F-body down the track.

Oh, and 2001 Cobras are easy money, by the way.
djlethalwang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 04:42 PM   #25  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 7,207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djlethalwang
Yeah, and your car is also a '98 model...

You can call BS all you want but anybody with any kind of knowledge of cars will know that a Mach 1 is very well capable of beating an LS1 stock for stock. F-bodies do usually put down more power to the wheels from the factory, but Machs are a few hundred pounds lighter, and have better suspension for launching off the line. The best time i've ever heard of out of a completely stock Mach down to the tires is a 12.8. MM&FF got one down to 13.1 in one of their tests. Give credit where credit is due...

I'm not saying i've never been beat by an LS1, because I have... but I have won more than I've lost. Several of my friends own F-bodies, so I respect those cars, but I can't stand it when someone thinks they are unbeatable. Even my buddies know that I can usually beat an F-body down the track.

Oh, and 2001 Cobras are easy money, by the way.
im not saying i doubt that it can happen, because it can. too many variables. however, MM&FF only got a Mach 1 down to 13.1? the same magazine got an LS1 SS down to 12.8. that doesnt look too good for your argument. i give credit, but i still think its a drivers race given stock for stock. the more i think about it the more i know its too close to call. and i dont agree with you that a Mach 1 is totally capeable of beating a stock LS1. its a drivers race. id say they are equally as fast one direction or another. but i digress, i dont think in this case it is fair of either of us to say one is faster than the other. agree to disagree?

BTW i have always had a soft spot for a Competition Orange Mach1 with black louvers.
bww3588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 07:10 PM   #26  
Teching In
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 10
Default

I'd agree that they are pretty much equal, yes... I didn't necessarily mean that EVERY Mach 1 can beat EVERY F-body. They are both pretty damn quick from the factory, and it usually is a drivers race with those two. Like I said, I respect the LS motors a lot because I hangout with guys that drive them. One of my good buddies is a member on LS1tech, his SN is SuperZ, and he's got pretty much the fastest car here in town. It's got a GT42 turbo(76mm wheel) and TH400, with a stock displacement, fully forged motor. That thing is DAMN fast... fast enough to beat a 2006 GSXR1000. (wish we had some video of it)

All I know is that I'd rather be driving anything that has some American muscle, than any of those gay *** Jap-**** cars.

And Competition Orange is niiiice.... that's the color I originally wanted
djlethalwang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 07:13 PM   #27  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 7,207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djlethalwang
I'd agree that they are pretty much equal, yes... I didn't necessarily mean that EVERY Mach 1 can beat EVERY F-body. They are both pretty damn quick from the factory, and it usually is a drivers race with those two. Like I said, I respect the LS motors a lot because I hangout with guys that drive them. One of my good buddies is a member on LS1tech, his SN is SuperZ, and he's got pretty much the fastest car here in town. It's got a GT42 turbo(76mm wheel) and TH400, with a stock displacement, fully forged motor. That thing is DAMN fast... fast enough to beat a 2006 GSXR1000. (wish we had some video of it)

All I know is that I'd rather be driving anything that has some American muscle, than any of those gay *** Jap-**** cars.

And Competition Orange is niiiice.... that's the color I originally wanted
jap ****.....

Comp orange, is that what you got or is yours red? i cant really tell from the picture.
bww3588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 01:31 AM   #28  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bww3588
jap ****.....

Comp orange, is that what you got or is yours red? i cant really tell from the picture.
Man if my a-5 can run 13.70's at a heafty 3500lbs with 331 hwy gears what makes you think that a 4v mach which is lighter and manual 5speed can't out run a stock z 98 model without the ls6 intake? I believe the Mach came with 3.55 gears also.
kennyxg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 02:21 PM   #29  
Teching In
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 10
Default

Mine is Torch Red, which was actually my 2nd choice so I didn't come out too bad. I like the red and black pretty well anyway.


And yeah, those new Mustang are quite a bit heavier. I weighed my car at a CAT scale and it weighed 3280lbs. without me in it. I'm sure with some small weight reduction stuff, I could get it into the 3100s pretty easy... some Mach owners have gotten into the high 2000s before driver.
djlethalwang is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FOR SALE: 2003 Yamaha R6 with less than 1200 miles! BONE STOCK! Blue91 For Sale 2 02-25-2007 07:32 PM
a few kills dan03mach Street Racing & Kill Stories 14 10-02-2006 11:48 AM
Any bone stock LS1s in Houston? Nine Ball Street Racing & Kill Stories 33 04-18-2006 10:11 PM


Tags
06, cheap, engine, free, gt, mods, mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.


© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.