Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercooling | Water/Methanol Injection

Paxton vs Procharger vs ????? : 99 F-150 5.4ltr

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2006, 12:20 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Default Paxton vs Procharger vs ????? : 99 F-150 5.4ltr

not a mustang.. but ford 2 valve 5.4 in 99 F-150.... what is the better blower??

my father in law is going to buy one... also what kind of gains will he see? it is a 4x4 truck..... ext. cab....... heavy as F**K.

I think it dynos around 230whp and 270ish tq IIRC.
WizeAss is offline  
Old 04-09-2006, 07:22 AM
  #2  
EPP
FormerVendor
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,084
Default

A Paxton is no match for an ATI ProCharger, no matter what type of vehicle or engine it is installed in. Tell your father in law to go with the ATI ProCharger. Bob
EPP is offline  
Old 04-10-2006, 02:56 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,531
Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
A Paxton is no match for an ATI ProCharger, no matter what type of vehicle or engine it is installed in.
I'll go ahead and disagree with that.
-Ross- is offline  
Old 04-10-2006, 04:40 PM
  #4  
Mustang Moderator
 
Blue91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 70
Default

werd to the bird.
Blue91 is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 07:54 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
cws T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,290
Default

I vote kenne bell for a truck more instant boost and lots of torque
cws T/A is offline  
Old 04-20-2006, 08:28 PM
  #6  
Mustang Moderator
 
LS1 KLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 358
Default

Originally Posted by cws T/A
I vote kenne bell for a truck more instant boost and lots of torque
I second the vote....roots type blower would work best!
LS1 KLR is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 12:31 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
 
Bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 742
Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
A Paxton is no match for an ATI ProCharger, no matter what type of vehicle or engine it is installed in. Tell your father in law to go with the ATI ProCharger. Bob
And why are they better? The only blower that I think is better would be the F1 but that's more of a race blower. On the street all you see is the P1SC's and D1's. P1's are basically equal to S-trims, and novi 1000's and D1's are equal to T-trims and novi 2000's. Flow#'s are about the same. The only difference is that procharger is self contained which I personally don't like. Procharger has a 1 yr warranty with an option to buy a 3yr. Vortech give a 3 year warranty. Don't know what paxton offers. I myself will be going the novi route when I go FI. -Mark
Bitemark46 is offline  
Old 05-20-2006, 03:43 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Default

I assume the powerdyne is not = to the procharger.. i heard the NOVI's are closer.... and the vortech is not as good due to the water cooler vs air to air.

so

Procharger, then Novi, then Vortech, then Powerdyne.... and a roots setup is only better when it is intercooled... and a screw is the best.... sound good?
WizeAss is offline  
Old 05-20-2006, 03:45 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Default

Originally Posted by cws T/A
I vote kenne bell for a truck more instant boost and lots of torque
and alot more money!
WizeAss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gmcperformance432
Internal Engine
0
05-12-2011 12:52 PM
mharring
For Sale
1
09-19-2010 07:42 AM
S2K
General Maintenance & Repairs
0
01-10-2010 09:14 AM
Mike@ZMS
Internal Engine
2
09-22-2007 03:14 PM
LS1 KLR
Forced Induction
18
04-20-2006 08:48 PM



Quick Reply: Paxton vs Procharger vs ????? : 99 F-150 5.4ltr



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.