94-95 Cobras
Apr 28, 2006 | 12:47 PM
#11
TECH Resident
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 883
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by NiCk
I don't think its that much. I think stock its closer to 235. Only thing diff on the motor is the intake manifold.
If I were you I would go for a 96-98 Cobra. Yeah its not a 5.0 but the 94-95 cars are a pain in the a$$ to tune. The EEC IV SUCKS. Now days mod motor is the way to go if you are gonna get a sn-95 car. Even if you get a GT you can make the 2V motor run 11's all motor with the right combo.
Just my $.02
If I were you I would go for a 96-98 Cobra. Yeah its not a 5.0 but the 94-95 cars are a pain in the a$$ to tune. The EEC IV SUCKS. Now days mod motor is the way to go if you are gonna get a sn-95 car. Even if you get a GT you can make the 2V motor run 11's all motor with the right combo.
Just my $.02
This guy stock was 232/280
http://www.corral.net/forums/showpos...48&postcount=6
This guy 220/264
http://www.geocities.com/mkoebra1995/MAF2.html
I guess Fords drivetrain efficiency is as good as the LS1's then huh?
The 94-95's had GT 40 heads with the intake.
Apr 30, 2006 | 04:36 AM
#12
Mustang Moderator
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 70
From: Houston, TX
The 94/95 cobra didn't have a GT-40 intake. It was a cobra intake. It had 1.7:1 "cobra" RRs (made by crane), gt-40 iron heads, a different cam, a larger MAF, 24# injectors, larger brakes all the way around, and some visual changes. The springs MIGHT be different, but control arms, shocks, struts and stuff are the same as the GTs.
They were different by more than a body part change and the brakes. A 98 Cobra "should" spank one by a large margin. At that point though, it becomes preference into which motor setup you'd rather work on when modifying. There are a TON of options out there for windsor motors, yet the 4v 4.6 seems to handle a ton of HP without even messing with the block or heads.
They were different by more than a body part change and the brakes. A 98 Cobra "should" spank one by a large margin. At that point though, it becomes preference into which motor setup you'd rather work on when modifying. There are a TON of options out there for windsor motors, yet the 4v 4.6 seems to handle a ton of HP without even messing with the block or heads.
May 20, 2006 | 05:07 PM
#14
Banned
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 219
Originally Posted by NiCk
I don't think its that much. I think stock its closer to 235. Only thing diff on the motor is the intake manifold.
If I were you I would go for a 96-98 Cobra. Yeah its not a 5.0 but the 94-95 cars are a pain in the a$$ to tune. The EEC IV SUCKS. Now days mod motor is the way to go if you are gonna get a sn-95 car. Even if you get a GT you can make the 2V motor run 11's all motor with the right combo.
Just my $.02
If I were you I would go for a 96-98 Cobra. Yeah its not a 5.0 but the 94-95 cars are a pain in the a$$ to tune. The EEC IV SUCKS. Now days mod motor is the way to go if you are gonna get a sn-95 car. Even if you get a GT you can make the 2V motor run 11's all motor with the right combo.
Just my $.02
And you don't think a 94/95 Gt can run 11's all motor?
Not trying to get on your *** or make enemys or nothing, but there is absolutly nothing wrong with the EEC-IV.
Also, the GT-40's on the cobras were the iron heads correct? They are not that much better than E7's, the GT40P aluminum heads are the good ones.
and holy crap did I dig this thread, sorry, didnt realize how old some of these threads are.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Speeds8erM-1
Multimedia Exchange
2
Apr 16, 2006 09:07 PM
