External Engine Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Headers | Exhaust | Ignition | Water Pumps

Cheapest, Best Headers.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2006 | 01:07 PM
  #1  
99camarosupersport's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,488
From: Indiana
Default Cheapest, Best Headers.

my friend has a 2k GT, and he's looking at buying headers this week. i know the pacesetter headers are about the best bang for the buck for f-body's, so what's the equivelant for the 4.6 2000 GT?
Old Apr 8, 2006 | 01:10 PM
  #2  
BWH2003's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 124
From: Indiana
Default

MAC headers are going to be your best bet for the money. Kooks or Stainless Works are the top but they are expensive.
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 10:47 PM
  #3  
99camarosupersport's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,488
From: Indiana
Default

does mac make a long tube header for the 4.6's?
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #4  
99camarosupersport's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,488
From: Indiana
Default

are hookers good on the 4.6?
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 01:28 AM
  #5  
K Bo's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 252
From: Houston, TX
Default

I would say go with Hooker's. I ran them on my '01 nd they were pretty good. I had some minor fitiment issues, but nothing major. I have heard horror stories of MAC. If I was gonna do my '01 all over again, I would have gotten SLP, if I couldn't afford Kooks or SSW.
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 03:08 AM
  #6  
BWH2003's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 124
From: Indiana
Default

if your doing headers on a 4.6 and you want a quality set for a great price nothing beats MAC headers. Yeah MAC makes long tubes for the 4.6 and you can also get their matching prochamber mid pipe. Bolt that up to a borla stinger catback and you will have music to your ears.
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 07:31 AM
  #7  
Shane97Cobra's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 15
From: Aurora, IL
Default

I too have heard too many horror stories about the 4.6L MAC long tubes. When they first came out they were leaving a lot of slag in the tubes. As a result the EGR system was picking some of this slag and recirculating it back through the motor scoring the cylinder walls. I heard stories of a lot of ruined motors due to long tubes. That was 4-5 years ago, so you would hope they corrected this issue. Just scared me enough to not use them.

I have ceramic coated BBK's on my car, been very happy w/ them. Have had friends use the hookers and be happy.

The Bassani mid-lenghts are another choice that I would highly suggest. They make the power of the long tube set ups, but leave you the room under the car to remove the trans w/o removing the passenger side header.
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 12:41 PM
  #8  
BWH2003's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 124
From: Indiana
Default

Yes MAC had a lot of problems 4-5 years ago but they got their stuff striaght and completely redesigned their headers. This new redesign is what everyone is talking about. I havent heard a bad thing yet about the new headers only positive remarks.

Also yes bassani is a great header but he said the cheapest and bassani is $$$.
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #9  
K Bo's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 252
From: Houston, TX
Default

With the "new" design of the MAC headers, can you drop the transmission without removing the passebger side header? That is why I went with the Hookers. There is no way I would want to do headers TWICE to save maybe $2-300.
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 08:00 PM
  #10  
Saleen91's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 104
From: Tomball, Texas
Default

Oh man please don't turn this into the corral with posts having "cheapest" and "best" in the same sentence. Those 2 RARELY ever go together.

Bang for buck headers usually include BBK and FRPP. But that's just my $.02



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 AM.